Monday, 19 June 2017

What is the wrong kind of criticism:

                                      Criticism must be justifiable and detailed.

I have tried in my Live Rock Critic to be honest, exact and to make observations directly connected to aspects of the performance I reviewed.  Criticism must be rational and focused.

More important, most directly connected to the details of behavior and the results of that behavior are my Political Satire Cartoons and Characters.  

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO EXPOSE IRRATIONALITY

When I write a LRC I am attempting to discredit performance which is not well done or not well composed or which is  false, invalid or faked through backing tapes or sequencing or other device. Lip synching  for sure and Auto Tune I don't know. 
 If I were to criticize another obscure or developing musician, I would try to say nothing or try to be helpful in some manner. It is gauche to trash and trash the unsuccessful. The alleged greats of the music industry, the highly touted are fair game for a wider range of criticism, and sarcasm and humor.

  Political criticism is different, certainly, the low level politician must be vigorously criticized, no quarter can be permitted. The criticism must be accurate, the criticism must be fair and rational alternatives must be presented not inoperable theories or unjust or capricious plans.

 This could also apply to music or art projects.  I keep a cartoon character type blogger and Drunkycocamovision You Tube Channel operator. Drunkycocamovision: The Blog featured the Arrival Of Trump in Victoria BC on Father's day. I told CC how easy it had been for DC to photograph Trump Plane, US1? and put it on his blog. CC said " That is because everything is done for you, I would write code" " I would build a mighty site". I guess if that man had to defecatate in the forest he would
                                                   Not with his bare hands , no not such a mighty feat , it could not be

 Dig a pit
     Dig a pit                                                                                                                                            Dig more pit.   Then he wouldst hew the wood of the forest and shape it and he wouldst form it and
                         he would build a house out, an out house and carve the moon with his teeth in to the door, so tough. And only then wouldst he elegantly deposit feces rendolent of the perfumes of the orient, ( Buddhist) a scent to offend none and delight many and such an edifice did he rear where another might have found a toilet or quiet spot in  the forest and have sim[ply crapped./

I have a general apology to everyone, I will, I will post it soon, somewhere where would one of your sites be CC oh where oh where can they be.With a tweedle dm and a tweedle dee oh where oh where

oh where, oh where can they be: I will look for his head and it will speak down to us from the heights . He will condemn the works, "laughable" you should quit and destroy all of your work and postings. You should never have ,.. anything.                                                                                     I 

7 comments:

  1. Well seeing you have dragged me into this, I have a useful link:

    http://jakemandell.com/tonedeaf/

    Take the test. It's hard, professional musicians often cannot beat 80%. I'm basically normal, at 75%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course you non-musician scored 75% on general wonderfulness. You should take a few testsI think.You are mentioned because of ridiculous criticism such as I should write the template code to be valid. You produce one peice of music that you could listen to the next day without cringing. That would be a typical musicians test.

      Delete
  2. You should take the test and perhaps a few more as well.
    OF COURSE YOU NON MUSICIAN GOT 75%, ON GENERAL WONDERFULNESS. PRODUCE ONE PIECE OF MUSIC THAT YOU COULD LISTEN TO A DAY LATER WITHOUT CRINGING. You were dragged into this by constantly negatively and insultingly trashing my work. You are tone deaf.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see either you took the test and failed, or have not taken it knowing you will.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To go further, a specialty, I simply said you had a template to upload into, after you boasted that you had created a site quickly. The rest is your reaction to that. I never said you should write code.

    I have written templates as well as just web code. It's even remotely possible some of my code is in blogspot, as I did contribute to PHPNuke, the farther of templated web sites.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It occurs to me that this is a useful place. I can explain without being screamed at.

    I have maintained that since you first put up music videos, there was something wrong. I have never changed my viewpoint and have told you what I think on occasions when you brought it up.

    You have accused good musicians of playing wrong notes and not doing a good job, when anyone could see that they were doing just fine. Anyone but you.

    After being told again to listen to a particular piece, that has obvious problems, I decided to find out why.

    I believe you have amusia. I think it's from an accident as that's one way people end up with this condition.

    This explains well the dislike of most music, the constant claims of wrong notes where there are none and the inability to hear what's wrong with what you have posted.

    All I can do is try to find truth, it's what I do.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusia

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah, foolish of me. I have omitted my aforementioned web site. A place I store my pictures. Now I understand no one comes here and no one will see but it is:

    http://carnagepro.com/

    ReplyDelete